Case Details: Deepak Kumar v. State of Haryana - [2025] 170 taxmann.com 597 (Punjab & Haryana)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- N.S. Shekhawat, J.
- Ms Neha Bindal & Satbir Singh Gill, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Rajinder Kumar Banku, Deputy Adv. General for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was involved in a case where a fake firm had conducted business transactions with number of firms. A complaint was registered against the petitioner and it was alleged that the petitioner was involved in fake firm transaction and he was not aware of the fact that the said firm was fake. He filed application for grant of anticipatory bail and submitted that the ITC availed by the firm of the petitioner, while dealing with the fake firm, had already been reversed.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the FIR was registered by the police on 18.06.2019 and the petitioner was sought to be arrested after more than 05 years and 06 months but co-accused had already been granted anticipatory bail. The Court further noted that the documentary evidence had already been taken into possession by the police, during the course of investigation and the petitioner had reversed the ITC availed by the firm.
Therefore, without commenting on the merits of the case, the Court held that the petitioner would be granted concession of anticipatory bail, subject to the conditions as provided under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
The post Anticipatory Bail to Be Granted to Applicant as ITC Was Reversed and Co-Accused Had Already Been Granted Bail | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.
