Vinay Vohra & Co.

Appellant Rightly Penalised for Continued Non-compliances w.r.t. Appointment of Women Director & CS | SAT

Best Taxation Service

We are a thriving firm of Chartered Accountants with the goal of providing a one-stop shop for all financial services.

Business Strategy & Growth

We believe integrity is the quintessential value that is the engine behind getting things done in the organization.

Highly Dedicated Worker

You can put your trust in the economic realm and expect the best outcome. With a strong team that possesses the necessary skill set .

Appointment of Women Director

Case Details: Shree Pushkar Chemicals & Fertilisers Ltd. v. National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. - [2023] 153 taxmann.com 398 (SAT-Mumbai)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer & Ms Meera Swarup, Technical Member
    • Amit Jaste, PCS & Karan Varma, Adv. for the Appellant.
    • Pradeep Sancheti, Sr. Adv., Rashid BoatwallaMs Samiksha RajputSagar Divekar, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the appellant company being in the list of top 1000/2000 listed companies was required to appoint an independent woman director by 1-4-2020 as per Regulation 17(1)(a) of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosures Requirements) Regulations, 2015. Further, it was required to appoint a Company Secretary as a compliance officer.

However, it appointed an independent woman director on 10-11-2020 and a company secretary on 10-10-2020. Accordingly, penalties and fines were imposed for non-compliance for the quarters ending 30-6-2020, 30-9-2020 and the quarter ending 31-12-2020 by BSE and NSE.

The appellant applied for a waiver of fines, contending that in view of the Covid pandemic and lockdown declared in March 2020, there was a nationwide closure of all the industries and it was not possible to comply with Regulation 17(1) and Regulation 6 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosures Requirements) Regulations, 2015.

It was observed that the appellant had given sufficient explanation and justification for the waiver of fines for non-compliance of Regulation 17(1)(a) and Regulation 6 within the prescribed period. Further, it was observed that the imposition of a fine by two Stock Exchanges for the quarters ending 30-6-2020 and 30-9-2020 could not be sustained.

SAT Held

The SAT held that since the situation had eased, the appellant should have taken care to appoint a woman director and a company secretary at the earliest and the appellant having not done so, respondents were entitled to impose a fine for the quarter ending 31-12-2020.

List of Cases Referred to

    • Shekhawati Poly-Yarn Ltd. v. National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. [Appeal no. 432 of 2021 dated 13-7-2022] (para 16)
    • Kesar Petroproducts Ltd. v. Bombay Stock Exchange [Appeal no. 432 of 2022, dated 10-8-2022] (para 16).

The post Appellant Rightly Penalised for Continued Non-compliances w.r.t. Appointment of Women Director & CS | SAT appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

1

Auditing - Assurance

2

Goods & Services Tax

3

Investment in India by Foreign Nationals & NRI's

4

Accounting & Bookkeeping

5

International Taxation

6

Startup Services

7

Mergers & Acquisition Advisory

8

Income Tax

9

Corporate Financial Services

10

Indian Business Advisory Service
Have Any Question?

Always willing to lend a hand and answer any questions you may have. It would be great if you could contact us.

Newsletter

Signup our newsletter to get update information, insight or news