Vinay Vohra & Co.

Belated Rectification After Six Years Time-Barred – Merits Challenge Fails | HC

Best Taxation Service

We are a thriving firm of Chartered Accountants with the goal of providing a one-stop shop for all financial services.

Business Strategy & Growth

We believe integrity is the quintessential value that is the engine behind getting things done in the organization.

Highly Dedicated Worker

You can put your trust in the economic realm and expect the best outcome. With a strong team that possesses the necessary skill set .

rectification time barred

Case Details: Ahamed Usman vs. Deputy Commissioner - [2026] 185 taxmann.com 31 (Kerala)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Devan Ramachandran & Basant Balaji, JJ.
  • P. RaghunathanPremjit NagendranRishal K., Advs. for the Petitioner.
  • Rajesh K. Raju, Adv. & Smt. Thushara James, Sr. GP for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The assessee filed a writ petition challenging the impugned order and sought a direction to consider a rectification application filed for the correction of returns for the prior periods. It was submitted that the rectification application ought to be considered and the impugned order be set aside on merits. The Department of Revenue submitted that the statutory time limit prescribed for rectification including the extension granted thereunder, had expired in March 2019 and that the application filed in January 2024 was hopelessly time-barred. It was further submitted that the writ petition had been rightly dismissed on the ground of limitation. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the statutory time limit prescribed under Section 39 read with Section 168A of the CGST Act and the corresponding provisions of the Kerala GST Act is mandatory and binding, and that, having expired in March 2019, no rectification application filed thereafter could be entertained. The Court held that the rectification application filed in January 2024 was hopelessly time-barred and that no direction could be issued to consider it. It was further held that recourse to rectification after a prolonged delay constitutes admission of error by the assessee, thereby rendering the challenge to the impugned order on merits untenable. Accordingly, it was held that no ground for interference with the prior judgment and the appeal was dismissed.

List of Cases Referred to

The post Belated Rectification After Six Years Time-Barred – Merits Challenge Fails | HC appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

1

Auditing - Assurance

2

Goods & Services Tax

3

Investment in India by Foreign Nationals & NRI's

4

Accounting & Bookkeeping

5

International Taxation

6

Startup Services

7

Mergers & Acquisition Advisory

8

Income Tax

9

Corporate Financial Services

10

Indian Business Advisory Service
Have Any Question?

Always willing to lend a hand and answer any questions you may have. It would be great if you could contact us.

Newsletter

Signup our newsletter to get update information, insight or news