Vinay Vohra & Co.

HC Dismissed Writ Challenging Notification Which Denied Appeal in Respect of Demand Not Involving Tax

Best Taxation Service

We are a thriving firm of Chartered Accountants with the goal of providing a one-stop shop for all financial services.

Business Strategy & Growth

We believe integrity is the quintessential value that is the engine behind getting things done in the organization.

Highly Dedicated Worker

You can put your trust in the economic realm and expect the best outcome. With a strong team that possesses the necessary skill set .

Writ Challenging Notification

Case Details: Bharat Aluminium Co. Ltd. v. Union of India - [2024] 161 taxmann.com 653 (Chhattisgarh)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Ramesh Sinha, CJ. & Mrs Rajani Dubey, J.
  • Bharat RaichandaniOmkar Sharma & K. Rohan, Advs. for the Petitioner.
  • Ramakant Mishra, Dy. Solicitor General, R.S. Marhas, Additional Adv. General & Maneesh Sharma, Adv. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner filed refund application for unutilized ITC of GST paid on coal. The department issued show cause notice on ground that supply of electricity to township was a non-business activity. The order was passed and a portion of refund was rejected. The petitioner received said order after a period of more than one year had passed.

It filed appeal against the order but the same was rejected on ground of limitation. It filed writ petition and challenging Notification No. 53/2023-CT which provided that no appeal under this notification shall be admissible in respect of a demand not involving tax.

High Court Held

The Honorable High Court noted that the petitioner filed appeal after a delay of 1 year 1 month and no cogent reason was afforded for such an inordinate delay. The appeal filed by the petitioner was barred by limitation and it was not in a position to avail the benefit of the extension of the time period granted by the Notification No. 53/2023-CT.

Further, the Court also noted that no cogent reason was assigned as to how clause 5 of impugned notification was ultra vires to Constitution of India. Therefore, the Court held that the relief sought by petitioner to declare clause 5 of impugned notification as ultra vires shall not be accepted and the writ petition was dismissed.

List of Cases Referred to

  • Union of India v. N.S. Rathnam & Sons [2015] 60 taxmann.com 342/51 GST 852/34 GSTR 38 (SC) (para 10),
  • Bhavnagar university v. Palitana Sugar Mills (2003) 2 SCC 111 (para 11)
  • Arvind Gupta v. Asstt. Commissioner of State Taxes [WPA No. 2903 of 2024] (para 13).

The post HC Dismissed Writ Challenging Notification Which Denied Appeal in Respect of Demand Not Involving Tax appeared first on Taxmann Blog.

source

1

Auditing - Assurance

2

Goods & Services Tax

3

Investment in India by Foreign Nationals & NRI's

4

Accounting & Bookkeeping

5

International Taxation

6

Startup Services

7

Mergers & Acquisition Advisory

8

Income Tax

9

Corporate Financial Services

10

Indian Business Advisory Service
Have Any Question?

Always willing to lend a hand and answer any questions you may have. It would be great if you could contact us.

Newsletter

Signup our newsletter to get update information, insight or news